Reston Spring

Reston Spring
Reston Spring
Showing posts with label Architecture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Architecture. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Last Chance to Make Your Voice Heard on the Draft Reston Master Plan, Terry Maynard, January 22, 2014

The draft master plan for Reston’s share of the Dulles Corridor and the Town Center area will be the subject of a public hearing by the Board of Supervisors next Tuesday, January 28, 4:30PM, in the Government Center auditorium.  It will be the last chance for Restonians to present its concerns, views, and suggestions on the draft plan before the Board considers amendments and approves the draft plan.  

As it stands now, the draft plan overwhelmingly represents the views of developers and land use attorneys who numerically dominated the task force.  Reston’s leading civic groups—RA, RCA, and ARCH—and a few other independent Restonian members of the task force have been active voices over the last four years, but their voices and votes have been drowned by the special interests of the majority developers, landowners, and attorneys.   Their view is that the plan should stay out of the way as exemplified by the dozens of references to “flexibility” throughout the draft plan, attempts to limit commitments to open space, sustainable development, architectural review, controlling traffic congestion growth, and commercial vs. housing balance commitments throughout the process. 

They are also dominating the preparation of the task force’s report to the Board of Supervisors.  The draft task force report attempts to weaken further the language of the draft plan as it has been presented to the Board.  RCA has taken the time to thoroughly review and comment on the draft task force report’s shortcomings including many more than described above.  Ultimately, RCA voted  “nay” on the draft task force report. 

Even the Planning Commission has amended the draft Plan on its way to the Board by cutting out a proposed requirement that new construction be reviewed by RA’s Design Review Board.  The likely result:  A developer-dominated design review board (if any) that won’t care about architectural excellence—a key Reston planning principle.  For example, see the results around Wiehle and Sunset Hills from the previous RCIG Architectural Review Board (ARB).  Would you like to see a high-rise version of that asphalt and concrete mess?

The situation has not been helped by the fact that County property tax revenue coffers have been stagnant for years, and the Board has been criticized by national bond rating agencies (“outlook negative”) for its overspending in a tighter economic environment as Federal tax dollars for employees and contractors has declined with the recession, sequestration, and irresponsible government shutdowns.   All of this has led the Board to focus on generating more taxable property growth in its urbanizing areas—Tysons, Reston, Springfield, and others—no matter what the community costs.   That is a far easier course of action for the Board than cutting budgets or increasing tax rates. 

RCA’s Reston 2020 Committee has written extensively about the issues and opportunities a new Reston master plan needs to address.  It has produced more than a dozen major papers, many approved by the RCA Board of Directors, available from links on its website detailing these issues and opportunities.  As the task force process began steamrolling toward its conclusion last autumn, RCA’s representative called up on the task force to produce a draft plan that befit this planned community.   It has not. 

It is now up to you, Reston residents, to make your voice heard unless you want to see a Dulles Corridor that:

  • Reminds you of Crystal City in its property line to property line, concrete and glass, cubist architecture;
  • Makes it virtually impossible to drive from one side of Reston to the other—or even to/from the toll road—during rush hours with 5-6 minute delays at each key intersection the norm;
  • Guarantees next-to-no new open and recreational space, including only three athletic fields for the area’s expected 40,000 new residents; and
  • Fails absolutely in describing how any of its plans might be implemented;
  • And other shortcomings as detailed in RCA’s Reston Master Plan Report Card.

I would ask that you each consider whether it is worth your time to attend the hearing next Tuesday to hear what your community representatives (and developers) have to say and, if you are willing, to present a short statement (three minutes is the limit) to the Board about your concerns and ideas for building a better urban Reston area.  To sign up to speak at the hearing, please goto this webpage on the County website.  

It is our community’s last chance to make a difference in a plan that will guide the urbanization of Reston’s core for two or more decades.  We need your help.  Please attend next week’s hearing and testify if you are willing.  

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Supervisors Approve Spectrum Redevelopment, Reston Patch, January 8, 2013

UPDATE:  This morning (1/9/13) we received this drawing of the Spectrum Center redevelopment proposal--thought to be an earlier version of the current plan we called "brutalist" below.  This depiction, if more accurate than the rendering below of Lerner's redevelopment intentions, is more in line with Reston's expectations for "complete streets" that include trees and other attractive pedestrian buffer features known as "streetscapes."  The drawing does not, however, seem to suggest significant variation in building heights or street-side plazas as called for in the Reston Task Force's ongoing planning effort.   Nonetheless, if the rendering provided in Reston Patch yesterday accurately portrays the redevelopment proposal approved by the Board of Supervisors, it is even less consistent with Reston's vision of attractive, livable, pedestrian-friendly placemaking for its urban core than previously proposed.

This drawing also shows the current diamond-shaped Town Center Office Building surround by a rectangle of surface parking.  The Board of Supervisors recently approved Whelan's redevelopment of this property.  It will be Reston's tallest office building at 23-stories--at least for awhile, outside the transit-oriented development 1/2-mile circle, and constructed from one lot line to the other in both directions across the parking lots shown here (it will include a 6-story parking garage).  It is a true example of commercial development insensitive to the community's vision and oft-stated wishes, including testimony to the Board of Supervisors. 


An earlier drawing of the proposed redevelopment of the Spectrum Center area with extensive streetscaping.
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Vision for area from New Dominion to Baron Cameron is high-density, mixed-use Reston urban core.

 The Fairfax County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday unanimously approved the plans for redevelopment of Reston's Spectrum Center, ensuring that the Reston of the future will have Reston Town Center-like development from the Dulles Toll Road (and future Metrorail station) to Baron Cameron Avenue. . .
A rendering of what a building at the Spectrum might look like.
The plan for the Spectrum includes 774,879 square feet of non-residential use; 1,422 multifamily residential units (with 12 percent set aside for affordable housing) in seven new residential buildings; 38 percent open space; underground and structure parking; LEED certifications; two new east-west streets and expanded bike trails and pedestrian access. . . . 
Click here for the details of the approved development plan and the history of the Spectrum Center development effort.

To the extent that the rendering above accurately reflects the design of the Spectrum Center development, it shows once again the insistence of area developers to build from lot line to lot line in a massive, nondescript brutalist block manner highly reminiscent of Arlington's Crystal City development disaster.   The current draft Reston Task Force master plan calls for building heights and street fronts to be varied, including accessible plazas and other open spaces, to add architectural interest and livability to the new Reston downtown, "placemaking" in short.

This design fails massively at placemaking.