Reston Spring

Reston Spring
Reston Spring
Showing posts with label JBG. Show all posts
Showing posts with label JBG. Show all posts

Thursday, December 6, 2012

UPDATED--Agenda: Reston P&Z Committee Meeting, December 17, 2012

UPDATE FROM MIKE ROMEO, VC, RP&Z COMMITTEE

From: Michael Romeo
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Sent: Mon, Dec 10, 2012 3:26 pm
Subject: Re: Reston Planning and Zoning Committee December Agenda


All,
 
In order to address revisions requested by Fairfax County Staff, the RBP & M, Section 913, LP, and Bozzuto Development Company Rezoning/Final Development Plan is being moved to the January agenda.  JBG's Reston Heights West application will be the only application on the December 17th agenda.
 
Mike  
 



Friday, April 20, 2012

BOS approves JBG's Fairway Apartments proposal.

Fairfax Times reports:
The aging apartment complex, off North Shore Drive and across from Lake Anne Elementary School, is composed of 18 three-story buildings comprising 348 apartments.
Many Reston residents have voiced opposition to the redevelopment that would more than double the complex’s density, and have spoken out against it at public forums for nearly three years. Others have supported it. . . .
 Click here for the rest of the article.

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

RA Design Review Board Approves Fairway Plan, Reston Patch, February 22, 2012

Modern look, no "Texas Donut" mean developers can move ahead with redevelopment of aging complex.
By Karen Goff 
. . .  When JBG last presented to the DRB in June, it was criticized for townhouses that were too tall, a "Texas Donut" (big buildings centered around a parking lot) look for the multifamily buildings, and a look that did not fit in with the Lake Anne area of Reston.
The DRB was not going to approve it, but JBG asked for a last-minute deferral.
Now, the Texas Donut is gone and townhouses will be 3.5 stories. Parking for the multifamily buildings will be in a podium position that will blend in with the surroundings.
JBG architects also used nearby buildings, such as the Charles Goodman-designed Hickory Cluster, as inspiration for the exteriors of the townhouses, which now have a Cubist look to them. 
"The board should congratulate itself for sticking to its guns and getting to this point," said DRB member Ed Abbott. "And I congratulate JBG for sticking with us.". . .
Click here for the rest of Patch's good coverage of last night's DRB discussion of Fairway Apartments.  

Monday, January 30, 2012

Notes: RA DRB Workshop on Fairway Apartments Redevelopment, January 25, 2012

Wednesday’s DRB / JBG workshop was interesting.  Before the workshop began, I read my Oct. 22, 2011, letter to Cathy Hudgins (see link) citing the reasons a senior oriented development would make great sense and followed up with the stat from last the January 24 Reston Task Force meeting by Lisa Sturtevant of GMU that 60% of retirees stay in Fairfax Co. and probably that percentage is larger in Reston due to its unique flavor.  I stressed the win/win philosophy of Reston 2020.

JBG stated that they can’t afford to keep going back to the drawing board and wanted some direction from DRB as to what would be approved.  JBG’s John Schlicting was there and stated that he is retiring Feb. 1st.  He introduced Greg Trimmer who was there with his project partner, Bailey who would be taking over from him.

Nothing majorly new was presented by JBG except contemporary façades on the buildings.  DRB member Richard Newlon wasted no time in pointing this out.  He is not subtle and put JBG on notice early on that he was disappointed.  Other board members followed suit.

During a two hour discussion and back/forth, some on the DRB board gave passing thought to approving Texas Donut construction.  Comments were made that those cheaply constructed buildings do not age well and are miserable mass housing options not suitable for the community-focused Reston landscape.  Ed Abbott was particularly opposed to the Texas Donut and pointed out that when the DRB first met with JBG many months ago, it stated categorically that Texas Donuts were unacceptable structures for Reston .

Jennifer Byl was very concerned with the height at 3 ½ floors of the townhouses bordering the complex.  I was thinking that wasn’t as important and may even help integrate the bigger buildings in the complex except for the units directly adjacent to the Clubhouse Cluster. Too tall townhouses would block their western light.  Since there are only 8 of those units, not too many of the Fairways units might be affected if sited correctly.

At the end, I spoke up again and said to JBG, “Ditch the donut and pay attention to whom you are marketing.  If it’s young and singles, you will want one type of development but if it’s seniors and handicapped, you will design to another style.”

I was trying to facilitate a win/win by having JBG realize that seniors wouldn’t want or need a Texas Donut which would’ve helped the DRB get the substantive changes it needs to approve JBG’s plan, but Mike Miller commented that the DRB wasn’t concerned with JBG’s marketing focus.  Jennifer Byl did speak up in favor the senior concept, however.

What we need here is a classy development with superb architecture that will be welcomed with open arms and not devalue the neighboring properties by creating a traffic nightmare and overburdening of the surrounding infrastructure.

Another workshop is scheduled for February.  I don’t know if the BOS meeting (to approve the JBG proposal) will remain as scheduled.  That will be decided later.  Clearly Supervisor Hudgins is mediating between the DRB and JBG regarding comments made by the DRB who felt they had been taken advantage of by JBG’s going to the county P & Z before getting concept approval from the DRB.

I spoke to Greg Trimmer after the meeting briefly as well as wishing the JBG architect good luck and telling them both to not even consider a donut as it would never be approved in Reston .

Tammi Petrine
Co-Chair, Reston 2020

Monday, September 19, 2011

Reston Patch on Local Planning Issues

The Reston Patch has three good articles today about issues of interest to Restonians concerned about planning for Reston.

The first of these articles notes that the planned Board of Supervisors hearing on the JBG proposal for Fairway Apartments has been deferred. 

The developer has asked for a deferral at the request of Hunter Mill Supervisor Cathy Hudgins, who told them she needs more time to review the proposal, a JBG representative said Monday. A new date has not been set.
The article provides a good rundown on the state of play in JBG's over-reaching proposal.  Stay tuned.

The second article reports on this morning's BIZNOW conference of area political business leaders concerning Metrorail.  The bottom line:
 Phase 2 of Metrorail to Dulles will absolutely happen, area leaders said at a conference sponsored by Bisnow at the Ritz-Carlton Tysons on Monday.
While the article presents some comments by long-time northern Virginia Til Hazel, an observer at this morning's meeting offered the following additional comments:
 At BISNOW "What's Next in the Dulles Corridor" event this morning at the Tysons Ritz Carlton, Til Hazel stressed that Dulles Rail will not work until "Who Pays for It" is addressed. Til made it very clear to the 1,000+ audience that funding Dulles Rail with $10+ tolls on the Dulles Toll Road "is absolute nonsense."  If tolls are raised "to $20 in a few years, those tolls will not work."
Til described how Fairfax County Board has refused in recent months to look at the "who pays for it" issue and said: "This needs to be addressed by the political sector."

Til also said that we need a transportation network serving the entire area. Only 4% of the Dulles Rail riders will be Dulles Airport passengers and 10 to 12% of commuters will use train. The train will not serve most transportation needs.

(Til noted that) When Cabin John Bridge was planned 50 years ago, plans for seven Potomac bridges were made. Five proposed bridges were cancelled by anti growth activists. The Techway was cancelled. Cabin John Bridge now carries 230,000 vehicles per day, more than Woodrow Wilson Bridge. He said an additional 50,000 vehicles per day is forecast at Cabin John.

He said traffic problems will not be solved by politicians but by you individuals doing something active in your community to help resolve these problems. The business community has been AWOL from issues such as building bridges.

We need to determine how to pay for what we have already planned.

Til is not a believer in "smart growth." He suggested that most people do not "want to live in a one room apartment."

Til concluded: "I can't believe that the American Dream is dead."

Sharon Bulova and other panelists did not respond to any of Til's remarks or discuss the DTR financing problems. Tom Davis said: "After two decades of no money for transportation that's why toll road tolls seems to be what the voters want."
 The third Patch article focuses on tonight's meeting of the Reston P&Z committee and its discussion of the Spectrum Center redevelopment proposal.
The Reston Association Planning and Zoning Commission will hear from the developers of Reston Spectrum Monday about its latest plan to turn the 23-acre shopping center into a mixed-use, transit-oriented development with hundreds of residences and hotel rooms.

Reston Spectrum, owned by Lerner Enterprises, secured county approval of a finalized conceptual site plan in 2008 using extra density from the neighboring Reston Regional Library, which was deemed a park in 1992, allowing it to transfer density to nearby developers.
That it seems a bit tawdry that our elected leaders allowed public property to be used as a source of extras density for commercial development at the expense of the taxpaying electorate is, unfortunately, water over the dam.   But there is an election coming in November to remind them what you think about these shenanigans.

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Fairway Redevelopment To Go Before Supervisors on Sept. 27, Reston Patch, August 17, 2011

Public hearing next step for citizens to speak on issue. 

 by Karen Goff   Email the author

The Fairway Apartments redevelopment plan is scheduled to be presented to the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors on Sept. 27 at 4 p.m.

The county planning commission in late July recommended for approval JBG's plans for several five-story residential buildings and 131 townhouses on the site of the 40-year-old Fairway Apartments.

The Board of Supervisors vote will be the next step in the process. The public is invited to speak before the BOS. To register to speak click here. . . .
  Click here for the rest of this article. 

Commentary: The View from Over Here on JBG's Fairway Apartments Proposal, John Lovaas, Reston Patch, Aug. 16, 2011

 The final approval for JBG’s proposed redevelopment of the Fairway Apartment neighborhood along North Shore Drive may not be as in the bag as JBG thinks.

Here is the bad news, but also some good news.

The Hunter Mill District political appointee on the Fairfax County Planning Commission, Frank de la Fe, recently moved that the Commission recommend that the Board of Supervisors approve the latest JBG proposal to replace 346 nice and affordable Fairways Apartments on North Shore Drive with over 800 high-end units, largely apartment condos.

I am unaware of any redeeming traits in this proposal, but de la Fe pointed out one. . . .
Click here for the rest of Mr. Lovaas' commentary.  

Sunday, June 26, 2011

DRB Hears Latest Plan for Fairway Apartments, Reston Patch, June 22, 2011

Board defers decision on 804-unit campus off North Shore. 
By Karen Goff
Developer JBG Companies went before Reston Association's Design Review Board on Tuesday with new plans to redevelop the aging Fairway Apartments complex.

The two teams have been here before. For nearly two years, JBG has submitted five different plans to Reston and Fairfax County officials. The project has morphed from 951 units in four towers to 804 units on a campus of five-story buildings and townhouses. The 40-year-old neighborhood currently has 348 units in 18-three story buildings.

Tuesday's concept-only meeting with the DRB was significant because the Reston Planning and Zoning Committee in April approved the latest plan. That decision would hold weight when JBG next goes to the Fairfax Planning Commission in July.

After a lengthy discussion and perusal of a 48-page prospectus and traffic study, the DRB voted to defer a decision at the request of JBG. However, the DRB was leaning towards not approving the latest proposal. . . .

Click here for the rest of this article.

Friday, June 24, 2011

Reston’s Fairway Apartments project dodges negative vote, Fairfax TImes, June 24, 2011

Controversial Fairway Apartments proposal to go before county July 7


A sixth incarnation of a major redevelopment proposal for Reston’s Fairway Apartments was presented to the Reston Design and Review Board on Tuesday for a non-vote.

The complex's owners the JBG company have proposed redevelopment of the site since 2009. . .

. . . JBG will take its newly revamped proposal before the Fairfax County Department of Planning and Zoning on July 7, and had originally requested a vote from Reston’s Design and Review Board on the proposal’s concept plan in hopes of scoring an additional approval before its meeting with the county next month.

However, at its Tuesday evening meeting, several Reston Design and Review Board members instead criticized design elements within JBG’s proposal. . . .
 Click here for this excellent article on the DRB Fairway Apartments discussion.  

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Notes on DRB Discussion of Fairways Apartments, June 22, 2011

The Design Review Board of the Reston Association met tonight at the Reston RA headquarters to hear a “concept only” presentation by JBG for the Fairways Apartment development.  The normally sparsely attended hearing was crowded with Reston residents who came to witness the decision by the DRB which would bless or reject the current JBG plan.

Though the audience contained both supporters and critics of the plan for an 804 unit concept of both 3.5 level townhomes and 5 level multi-story midrise “Texas doughnut” style buildings clustered around a small “town green,” the critics easily outnumbered the supporters 10 to 1.

One supporter, Joe Stowers cited the need for balance and density in residential housing vs. the number of jobs available in Reston, stating that the Reston Special Study Master Plan Task Force had approved this principle. 

Other supporters were from the tiny cluster of townhouses surrounded by JBG’s Fairways property.  Their immediate concerns were for screening though JBG had pointed out earlier that the new project would be phased.  Phase 2, the Eastern portion of the JBG project could be redesigned to a much more lucrative scale if this cluster were to sell out.  Past questions to some of this cluster’s members have been met with denials, but only time will tell.

Most area residents were staunchly opposed to the scale and density of the current proposal, stating that the traffic would take North Shore Drive from its current “A” status to a “D.”  While Fairfax County only requires a “D” grade to approve a project, this certainly was unacceptable to community members from other areas of Reston as well as immediate neighbors.  The math, methods and timing of JBG’s traffic analysis were questioned as well.  Lacking in the 2009 analysis was any reference to the coming of Metro and the influence of its huge traffic influx to the formula.

Aside from detailed criticisms from a unanimous DRB, members of the audience continued to express dismay at the size of the project.  Although this was a “concept only” review, neighbors were adamant that the increased traffic would be a nightmare.  One immediate neighbor who regularly walks the area, Robert Ortega, voiced concerns about rush hour traffic and the location of the heavily populated Lake Anne Elementary School directly across the street from the Fairway plot.  He stated that even now the traffic snarls to accommodate the school buses can back traffic up for 15 to 20 minutes.  Two of the 3 exits from the 804 unit project are immediately across from the school property.  The third empties onto Fairway Drive directly across from his cluster.  He was also concerned about the safety of children coming and going from the school property.  Another resident voiced concern also for the many children who frequent the Hook Road fields on Fairway Drive as well as the large number of pedestrians in the area.

Though looking forward to redevelopment of the site, several audience members also voiced concerns about the distinctive architecture of the immediate surrounding neighborhood and the need for this project to enhance the unique qualities of Reston life.  Diane Lewis of Sustainable Reston, the leading local conservation and environmental organization, voiced concerns about the need for JBG to hit a high bar with project designs that ensure LEED standards for energy efficiency and environmental stewardship.

Marion Stillson, President of the Reston Citizens Association, presented a copy of a resolution passed by the RCA board more than a month ago, when the current plans were made public, which requested denial by the DRB on a number of points including the loss of over 342 affordable and workforce housing units which would be replaced by only 87 workforce units.  Also of concern to RCA, are the traffic issues, quality and design of construction, unparalleled density in an existing residential neighborhood, and its distance from employment and shopping venues.

Tammi Petrine, Co-Chair of RCA’s Reston 2020 Committee, a watch-dog organization active in the master plan process, noting the Metro Phase 2/Toll Road debacle and the Fairways project, spoke directly to JBG officials about the need for a concept that makes the Fairway project palatable to the community and profitable to JBG, making the project a potential win/win scenario.  She noted the critical need for senior and handicapped accessible housing has been made abundantly apparent.  “Visitable” units which are designed for access by handicapped persons and persons in wheel chairs are highly sought after, command increased prices, and are easy to construct. 

After a thorough re-cap by Richard Newlon of JBG’s repeated meetings with the DRB over the course of 2 years, the current project still contains many of the original problems, he concluded.  After a polling of the panel, a unanimous vote to deny the concept of the project was imminent.  Newlon made a motion to deny but before it could be voted upon, the JBG attorney jumped up and advised JGB to request a deferral.

This resulted in a spirited debate between Jennifer Byl and Neal Rosenberry of the DRB board regarding the merits of granting the deferral (Rosenberry) vs. voting for denial (Byl).  The first vote to decide this impasse resulted in a tie.  On the second vote, Richard Newlon capitulated and the vote for deferral passed, much to the disappointment of the majority of the audience.