Reston Spring

Reston Spring
Reston Spring

Wednesday, November 26, 2014

What’s going on at Reston National Golf Course?

The future of the Reston National Golf Course (RNGC), the neighborhoods that surround it, and County and RA infrastructure that supports that area of southern Reston—schools, streets, parks, open spaces, and natural areas—are in jeopardy because golf course owner Northwestern Mutual (NWM), operating as RN Golf Management, wants to turn its $5 million golf course purchase into a one billion dollar-plus mega-housing extravaganza.  That could be some 8,000 new homes and more than 20,000 added people living on its 166 acres, limited only by Reston’s overall density ceiling of 13 people per acre.  
For reasons that defy understanding, NWM’s attorneys believe the existing plan and zoning for the golf course area allows it to build several thousand multi-family housing units where the golf course now stands without any re-zoning as its 231-page appeal details.  If we may be so bold as to reduce that more than 200 pages of legal gibberish—multitudes of misrepresented legal citations, tormented and twisted logic, and a cornucopia of bluster and blather intended to obfuscate rather than enlighten—to a single sentence, we would suggest this is the core of NWM’s argument:  Nothing in the current Reston Master Plan or County zoning ordinance explicitly prohibits the redevelopment of RNGC into thousands of dwelling units; therefore, we have absolute “by right” authority under state law, the Reston Master Plan, and the County zoning ordinance to build them. 

OK, so—in simple terms—what do County planning and zoning documents say and show?
  • To start with, the existing Reston Land Use Plan map (p. 203 of the Upper Potomac Planning District Comprehensive Plan)—the specific official guidance element of the plan for land use--shows the existing RNGC as open space.   Moreover, the map shows the existing medium density housing (largely townhomes) that surrounds the golf course.  There is no room for more development around the course periphery.
  • Just so there would be no confusion, the Community Facilities Plan map on the following page shows RNGC as an existing “Major Open Space:  Parks, Golf Courses, Nature Center.”
  • Item #4 in the Land Use Recommendations section of the plan—which is intended to guide future development and redevelopment—states the following:
Well-defined stable residential neighborhoods exist throughout Reston.  However, because of nearby commercial and other nonresidential uses, these neighborhoods can be threatened by development or redevelopment, and therefore are particularly in need of protection.  The design of all new infill projects or redevelopment projects should be compatible with existing and planned residential neighborhoods.
  • The reason that NWM doesn’t want to seek re-zoning for the golf course, insisting that it already has the right to redevelop under current zoning, is that the zoning ordinance for planned development states, under General Standards,
A rezoning application or development plan amendment application may only be approved for a planned development under the provisions of Article 6 (which covers planned development like Reston’s PRC) if the planned development satisfies the following general standards:
1. The planned development shall substantially conform to the adopted comprehensive plan with respect to type, character, intensity of use and public facilities. . . . (that is, go see the maps and text referred to above in the Reston Master Plan).
So, in black and white, the Reston Master Plan and the County’s zoning ordinance are pretty clear on the matter:  If you want to turn RNGC into thousands of multi-family dwellings, you will have to change the plan and go through a re-zoning process.  And that is just not going to happen.  

More broadly, the Reston Master Plan, like the rest of the County’s Comprehensive Plan, is an affirmation of what should be done to achieve certain community development goals.  It is not a listing of prohibitions although it restricts densities and occasionally specific uses in certain areas.  That said, the core assertion by NWM and its attorneys that a plan omission means permission is absurd.

Seeing what we’re seeing in the Reston Master Plan and County zoning ordinance as well as the input and recommendation of the Department of Planning and Zoning (DPZ) staff, the County’s Zoning Administrator rejected NWM’s claim of “by right” development more than two years ago.  NWM immediately appealed, but then deferred their appeal at least four times, the last one “indefinitely,” possibly because of the petitioning and protesting of literally thousands of Reston residents led by Rescue Reston (a Reston citizens group focused on preventing RNGC’s redevelopment), the Reston Citizens Association, the Reston Association, and Hunter Mill Supervisor Cathy Hudgins.

Now NWM has a critical reason to revive its zoning appeal:  New language in the draft Reston Master Plan (p. 47) for the community’s neighborhood areas says:

The Reston National (Tax Maps 17-4((11) 4A, 26-2 ((2)) 8, 26-2 ((5)) 4) and Hidden Creek Country Club (Tax Maps 17-2 ((24)) 1 and 17-4 ((10)) 2) golf courses are planned for private recreation use, more specifically to remain as golf courses.
That is as explicit as it gets.  If this is approved by the Board of Supervisors, NWM will not have a legal leg to stand on no matter how many pages of ink they spill on a new appeal or a subsequent court action.  And this draft language will almost certainly be included in the approved new Reston Master Plan next spring given the outrageous community controversy NWM has created.  

Now NWM is suddenly in a hurry. This may be their last chance before the new Reston Master Plan is approved that completely takes away the foundation of their development “by right” argument.  So they have asked the County that their appeal to the County Board of Zoning Appeals (BZ) be re-scheduled. 

One of the three specific responsibilities of the County’s BZA is “(h)earing and deciding appeals of administrative decisions made pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance.”  And that is what they will do with regard to NWM’s scheme.  In most cases, the BZA makes its decision at the time of the hearing.  According to the Fairfax County BZA webpage, “The BZA may affirm or reverse, wholly or partly, or may modify the order, requirement, decision or determination that is at issue in the appeal and the concurring vote of four (4) members of the BZA is required for any such action.” 

NWM’s appeal hearing is now scheduled for January 21, 2015, at 9 AM in the Fairfax County Government Center Board Auditorium.  All Restonians have a strong vested interest in the outcome of this hearing and should attend if at all possible.  Your presence will be a strong continuing symbol of Restonians opposition to this outrageous proposal.

If the BZA rejects the NWM appeal, we anticipate they will appeal further to the Circuit Court as is their right.  It is quite possible they will take the case all the way to the Virginia Supreme Court if their position is not upheld by lower courts.  From their perspective, they have little to lose and a billion dollar payout prospect at stake!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Your comments are welcome and encouraged as long as they are relevant, constructive, and decent.