Notes from the
meeting of the Library Board of Trustees Director Selection Committee
Charles
Fegan, Chair of the Library Board of Trustees, welcomed the members of the
Committee and also welcomed Sharon Bulova, Chair of the Board of
Supervisors. Mr. Fegan stated that the
Committee’s task is to find candidates for the final interview for the
Director’s position by the Library Board. He noted the growth of the FCPL
system under Sam Clay and said that he felt privileged to have worked with Sam
for many years. He said that the Library
is a $30 million dollar a year organization with over 500 employees; the next
Director will have to be knowledgeable in many areas such as finance and
organizational development in addition to technical matters related to
libraries.
Sharon
Bulova added her appreciation for Sam Clay’s years of presiding over FCPL’s
evolution from a rural library system to the much larger system that it is
today. She related her memory of contacting Mr. Clay years ago in her position
as a newly hired aide to Audrey Moore to arrange for “mobile library” service
to the Robinson Square housing complex to provide constructive activities for
young people who lived there and were getting into trouble. She said that no one legislates that we must
have a library system; she considers FCPL a major quality of life resource and
noted the really strong Friends organizations.
She stated that the Committee is doing important work in searching for a
new Director who will develop the library system for the future. She affirmed that the Library Board is an
authority and added that the Board of Supervisors needs to be involved and to
weigh in on the hiring of a new Director.
She spoke of her interest in renewing a close relationship between the
Board of Supervisors and the Library Board.
A date is being sought to meet for “board to board” renewal. (NOTE: For a transcript of some of Chairman Bulova's more assertive remarks, please read this transcript.)
Karrie
Delaney asked the members of the Search Committee to introduce themselves. In addition to Sharon Bulova and Charles
Fegan, two other attendees who are not Committee members introduced themselves: Sue Woodruff, head of County HR, and Leslie
Amiri, an HR staff person who may assist the Committee. Ms. Delaney said that at the end of today’s
meeting, she wanted Committee members to feel confident about understanding the
scope of effort and County regulations that will come into play.
Sue
Woodruff presented an information packet which contained the current position
description for the Library Director and the position class
specifications. Both documents can be
edited. She also furnished to Committee
members a copy of the summary report and findings of the Trustees’
Communication and Evaluation Committee which she stated showed what was on
people’s minds. She provided copies of
guidance on selecting a Director from the Library of Virginia’s Manual for Trustees. She noted that executive level recruitments
in County Government are a little more flexible in process. She gave the Committee members a timeline
covering what needs to be accomplished over the next several months including
deciding what kind of outreach for public comment that the Committee wishes to
do, developing the job ad, deciding on the time period during which the ad will
run and the time period during which applications will be accepted, and making
contacts through professional organizations to spread the word to people who
are not actively seeking new positions but who might be recruited to apply. Ms. Woodruff initially suggested the months
of June, July and August 2015 as the time period during which applications
could be accepted. Mr. Fegan noted that
summer is perhaps a less desirable time because many people who are searching
for new positions would have secured them before summer. The level of job seeking activity may decline
during summer due to vacations. Ms.
Woodruff then suggested May, June and July 2015 with the possibility of
extending the application period through September.
There
was some discussion about Freedom of Information requirements as well as any
legal restrictions on what the Committee may say and do that the Committee
would need to be aware of. Ms. Woodruff
said that she has sent an inquiry to the County Attorney to obtain information
and answers for the Committee on the questions of privacy and confidentiality. She stressed the need for clarity on the
confidentiality issue. Names of
candidates for the Director’s position should not be shared with the public.
Chairman
Bulova suggested creating focus groups to put together a list of attributes
that would be desirable in the next Director.
Ms. Delaney spoke in favor of several months of outreach to the public
asking what this position means to people and what traits would be important to
them. Ms. Delaney discussed ways to move forward on collecting such information
including hosting public outreach sessions in different parts of the County at
different times – perhaps one meeting in each regional library. The meetings should have facilitators. There was a discussion on ways to get a good
turnout with a diverse group of participants.
Mr. Molchany suggested that Pat Harrison, Deputy County Executive for
Human Services, Ann Cahill, and Tony Castrilli, Director of the Office of
Public Affairs would be very good resource people because they have experience
in doing successful outreach in multiple communities. He also said that County agencies could supply
facilitators. A discussion followed on the best ways to advertise these public
meetings including using the Friends of the Libraries’ mailing lists, FCPL
cardholders, and advertising to parents who bring children to Library programs
and to groups who book the Library branches’ meeting rooms. The Committee also
discussed the possibility of connecting this outreach effort to the planned
outreach effort for the Library’s upcoming community survey. The Fairfax County Public Schools serve a
large population and would have a huge mailing list. It was proposed that a representative from
the School Board be invited to a future Search Committee meeting.
The
Committee discussed its next steps which include setting up meetings with
County managers who can advise on outreach, planning public outreach meetings
and focus groups, collecting public feedback on desirable traits in the next
Director and then analyzing this data for the recruitment effort. It was suggested that the County’s 50 Plus
Committee might be an excellent focus group.
Both Jennifer McCullough and Duwain Ketch proposed a second Committee
meeting in the near future. Karrie
Delaney said that the Committee should consider meeting monthly to track its
activities and progress.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are welcome and encouraged as long as they are relevant, constructive, and decent.