Karen Goff provides insight into the Planning Commission's decision last night to send the Reston master plan to the Board of Supervisors in
 an excellent RestonNow article this morning.  
The Fairfax County Planning Commission on Thursday unanimously agreed to send proposed changes in the Reston Master Plan on to the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors for approva.
The plan — which was formulated after nearby four years of discussion
 and numerous draft changes by the Reston Master Plan Special Study Task
 Force — was sent on with a few line item changes and last-minute 
motions. . . 
. . . (A)t Thursday’s meeting, (Hunter Mill Commissioner) de le Fe verbally added these conditions, which were also unanimously passed:
- A recommendation to direct planning staff to review with Reston 
stakeholders how to incorporate Reston design specifics into future 
planning. “Special attention to design has been a hallmark of Reston 
from beginning,” said de le Fe.
 
- A recommendation to the Board of Supervisors to develop an inclusive
 process to prepare a funding plan for transportation improvements. “The
 planning commission strongly believes public and private investment in 
Reston is crucial,” he said.
 
- A recommendation to conduct a detailed valuation and analysis of an 
enhanced street network, prioritize improvements and develop an 
implementation strategy for it.
 
The Board of Supervisors is slated to discuss the plan on Jan. 28.
A couple of comments on de le Fe's changes:
- The recommendation to look closely at design issues appears to be intended to mitigate de le Fe's amendment not to require review by RA's Design Review Board.  It is a weak improvement.
 
- Funding transportation improvements is a major and critical issue for redevelopment around Reston's stations.  If Tysons is any indicator, we could see a special tax district incorporating the area covered by this revision created to address the $1-2 billion in transportation needs (current dollars; double that over 40 years--not including interest on bonds).  Worse, the Board could decide all of Reston should pay the price even though the development will provide no advantage--and huge traffic delays--to most current Reston properties.
 
- Implementation is the most massive missing ingredient in this plan.  As Reston 2020 has said for years, "Planning without Implementation is Empty."  And that's what this plan is.
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are welcome and encouraged as long as they are relevant, constructive, and decent.