Reston Spring

Reston Spring
Reston Spring

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Fairfax Residents Want Developers To Pay Impact Fees, WAMU, November 27, 2012

By: Michael Pope
Some residents in Fairfax County are pushing for a new tax that would force developers to pay for transportation improvements. . .
. . . (Nearby resident)  Davis and others believe it's time to create a new transportation-impact fee, so that when developers come forward with a by-right development like the Kings Crossing Wal-Mart, Fairfax County can charge for a new turn lane. . .
. . .  So far, county officials have resisted the idea, but some residents along the Route 1 corridor say it's time for developers to pay the price of gridlock.
Is anyone surprised by the reluctance of Fairfax officials to make the developers clean up the mess they make?

For the rest of this article, click here.

To listen to the full (1:21) WAMU broadcast, click here.

Saturday, November 24, 2012

Dedicated Bike Lanes Can Cut Cycling Injuries in Half, Atlantic Cities, October 22, 2012

By Emily Badger
Dedicated Bike Lanes Can Cut Cycling Injuries in Half
By Shutterstock
A major city street with parked cars and no bike lanes is just about the most dangerous place you could ride a bike. All the big threats are there: open car doors, bad parallel parkers, passing cabs and public transit. This is not a particularly novel scientific revelation, although research has found it to be true. Things get more interesting when we compare this bad-biking baseline to infrastructure actually intended to accommodate cyclists.
New research out of Canada has methodically done just this, parsing 14 route types – from that bike-ambivalent major street to sidewalks, local roads with designated bike lanes, paved multi-use paths and protected "cycle tracks" – for their likelihood of yielding serious bike injuries. As it turns out, infrastructure really matters. Your chance of injury drops by about 50 percent, relative to that major city street, when riding on a similar road with a bike lane and no parked cars. The same improvement occurs on bike paths and local streets with designated bike routes. And protected bike lanes – with actual barriers separating cyclists from traffic – really make a difference. The risk of injury drops for riders there by 90 percent.
Do we need to consider this in Reston as part of our planning effort?  If so, how would we accomplish these massive improvements in bicycle safety?

For the rest of this article, click here.  

Friday, November 23, 2012

Editorial: Silver Line forecasts are way off, Washington Examiner, November 21, 2012

In 2004, the Federal Transit Administration concluded that the Dulles Rail project was not cost effective, because population densities in the corridor to be served were less than half those required to support heavy rail. . .

. . . We already know that MWAA's 2009 estimate of employment and population growth in Fairfax County was wildly inaccurate, overshooting the final 2010 census numbers by 52 percent. The pro-transit Reston Citizens Association's 2020 Committee has also questioned MWAA's economic forecasts and is now making some predictions of its own:
* Over the next 40 years, population and employment growth in the Dulles Corridor will be lower than predicted;
* There's a 67 percent chance that MWAA's annual revenue forecasts will not be met, with 25 percent shortfalls possible in 40 years;
* 30,000 vehicles will divert from the Dulles Toll Road (Note:  in 2013 if tolls went to $4.50 as initially envisioned) to escape exorbitantly high tolls needed to fund Phase 2.
If the RCA is right, employment and growth rates in the Dulles Corridor will be much lower than the levels optimistically predicted by the outdated "Dulles model" from before the Great Recession, before the threat of sequestration and before density downsizing in Loudoun County. That will affect ridership. . .

. . . There is only one word for a project that costs $2.7 billion and creates more traffic congestion rather than less: insane. The FTA got it right the first time. The feds should spend scarce TIFIA funds on projects that make more economic sense.
We stand by our forecasts mentioned above that were all made months ago.  They were all based on the February 2012 CDMSmith traffic and revenue forecast performed for MWAA which assumed no outside aid to Silver Line construction.

We do not agree, however, with the Examiner editorial's conclusion that MWAA should not receive TIFIA funding for Silver Line construction.  Indeed, failure to provide substantial TIFIA funding for Phase 2 Metrorail construction will only make the economic consequences worse for the Dulles Corridor from Tysons to Loudoun County.   In its simplest terms, the more TIFIA funding used for Metrorail, the less Dulles Toll Road tolls will rise, and the greater the opportunity for some economic growth along the Dulles Corridor while toll road users and developers in the station areas' special tax districts still pay for the bulk of the Silver Line's construction.

And still the currenty 100,000 daily users of the toll road will need ample additional aid from future federal and state funding efforts to assure some degree of prosperity along the Silver Line.

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Dulles Greenway Tolls Likely to Increase Maximum Allowed in January 2013

An article in the November 20, 2012, Loudoun Times reports that filed an application to increase tolls in January by the maximum allowed under their agreement with Virginia--3.54%, squeezing the last hundredth of a percent out of its allowable rate increase.

The increase would put peak period tolls at about $4.97 and base tolls at about $4.14 if Macquarie Infrastructure Group (MIG), 50% owner in the TRIP II Greenway toll road management group, goes for the maximum.   They are likely to drop the toll increases back to the nearest dime--$4.90 and $4.10. 

The Greenway has been losing money for MIG since the TRIP II agreement with Virginia was signed.  Macquarie's 2011 annual report shows that while revenues increased by 2.6% last year on higher tolls, traffic was down by the same percentage.  Nonetheless, its losses are shrinking.  They lost $18 million in 2011 versus $20 million in 2010.  A chart in its mid-1012 investor presentation indicates that quarterly traffic performance has stabilized (see below) and revenues are up 8.6% over the same timeframe last year, suggesting that Dulles Greenway losses this year will be smaller than last.