Autumn on Lake Audobon

Autumn on Lake Audobon
Autumn on Lake Audubon, Photo by Alison Kamat

Friday, September 18, 2015

The County and Reston’s Future Urban Growth: A Broader Look (Corrected), RestonNow, September 17, 2015

As noted in RestonNow's presentation of this op-ed, there were material errors in the various calculations made in the latter half of the op-ed.  The following is a fully corrected version of that op-ed.  The author apologizes for any inconvenience caused by the earlier inaccurate article. 


The County and Reston’s Future Urban Growth:  A Broader Look

A few days ago, I wrote an op-ed published here on the County’s efforts to increase the allowed population density in Reston and double the permitted zoning density in Transit Station Areas (from FAR 2.5 to FAR 5.0, plus a 0.5 FAR bonus for affordable housing), including Reston’s three stations.    

Aside from allowing major density increases here, these proposed changes affect other types of County “districts”, such Community Business Districts, Commercial Revitalization Districts, and Commercial Revitalization Areas elsewhere in the County.  These include Baileys Crossroads, Seven Corners, McLean, Merrifield, Lake Anne (yes!), Annandale, Springfield, and most of the Richmond Highway area.  And, of course, all the areas surrounding the County’s Metrorail stations.   And we already have reliable commentary that developers intend to maximize density in at least one of these “districts” once the zoning law is changed.

All these areas would now be incorporated into the zoning code as either Planned Development Commercial Districts (PDCs) or Planned Residential Mixed-Use Districts (PRMs), the difference being the predominance of commercial or residential uses.   The density caps may be approved if the County “is implementing the density/intensity and other recommendations of the comprehensive plan or any other design guidelines endorsed by the Board.”  Any other guidelines;” that’s a hole as large as a skyscraper.

The adding of these “districts” to the PDC or PRM categorizations and upping the allowable density is all part of the Board of Supervisors’ strategy to allow massive urbanization of Fairfax County over the next several decades.   Not just the Reston you know, but the County you know would be completely different if market conditions permit.  

In fact, early this year the Board approved a new County “Strategic Plan to Facilitate the Economic Success of Fairfax County” that calls for this urbanization of Fairfax County.   The plan was developed by the County’s Economic Advisory Commission and its panel represented just about every County “sector” except residents, the people who pay more than half of the County’s taxes and elect its Board.  As you might expect, however, the strategic plan cynically states that the County’s vision is “To protect and enrich the quality of life for the people, neighborhoods and diverse communities of Fairfax County….”  But who needs them in preparing the plan?  What value could they possibly add?

The strategy makes these two critical changes in what we know as Transit Oriented Development (TOD) areas—“the half-mile circle”--around Metro transit stations:
Section 2.2.a: "Explore creation of 20 Minute Neighborhoods where a variety of housing options and jobs are linked by high capacity transit to support clusters of opportunity and innovation." A "20 Minute Neighborhood" is a ONE-mile ring from the Metro stations, doubling the current HALF-mile globally recognized “walkability” ring.  But that’s OK, we’re Fairfax County; we don’t need to be guided by global experience with human behavior.
Section 2.3.b: "Include the concept of expanded Transit Oriented Development (TOD) in future planning efforts by increasing the radius distance recommended for higher densities from ¼ mile to at least ½ mile around mass transit stations, such as Metrorail, light/heavy rail, or other rapid transit stations."  Like the preceding, this doubles the distance for the highest density development and the commercial vs. residential focus.  In general, density should taper from the station to the TOD ring boundary.

Not only does the County plan to double densities throughout transit station areas, it plans to double those densities at double the distance from the stations, changing each TSA area from ¾ square mile to more than 3 square miles.  And, yes, it expects you to walk a mile to catch Metro.   

All told, that offers up as much as 438 MILLION gross square feet (GSF) of potential development (5,280SF2 X  3 SqMi X FAR 5.0) at each County Metro stop where, in Reston, we currently have about 63 million GSF (FAR  about 1.9) in Reston Town Center, including Town Center North, a more than seven-fold increase in density.   If that were to be developed with 80% of that space focused equally on office and residential uses (175 million SF each, the rest in open space and other job uses), that would allow 580,000 office workers and 146,000 new housing units with nearly 292,000 residents in each transit station area using current County high-density office worker and residential space planning guidelines.  

Yes, that much development.

But here is what’s important:  That strategic plan is just a plan whose absurd values can be reduced or ignored at any time.  Even development potential laid out in the County Comprehensive Plan of which the Reston Master Plan is a part can be reduced at any time.  What cannot be reduced—as the Virginia Supreme Court told Fairfax County years ago—is development potential authorized in the zoning code.  Once density, measured by floor-area ratio (FAR), is embedded in the zoning code, the property owner has “by right” authority to develop the property to its limits subject to other constraints in the code (open space requirements, etc.).  

And that is why this proposed change to the County zoning code is so critical to Reston’s and many other County communities’ future.  

It is time for Reston’s community leaders at Reston Association, Reston Citizens Association, and the developer-dominated Reston Town Center Association to act on behalf of Restonians, just as other community groups around the County have been doing to protect their communities.  Aside from these two RestonNow postings, I have been in contact with all three groups to point out what is going on and asking them to represent Reston’s interests to the Board. 

All Restonians need to make their views known to Reston’s leaders and to the Board of Supervisors before we become locked into outrageous development that destroys the character of this Reston planned community as well as other PDC and PRM areas in the County.  Moreover, we need to tell the Board that the people of our County need to be involved as early in any such proposed changes as the business interests who desperately want them.

Terry Maynard
Reston 2020 Committee

No comments:

Post a Comment

Your comments are welcome and encouraged as long as they are relevant, constructive, and decent.