. . . but there is still some news about FCPL spending for
FY2014 although the final figures are not yet in.
Here is the table of FCPL General Fund expenditures for
FY2014 through May—eleven month of the fiscal year:
What stands out in the above table, the first three columns
of which are copied from the
Fairfax County Financial Transparency website, is that the Library
Administration has yet to spend a quarter ($1.8 million) of its operating
expense budget for this fiscal year.
Digging more deeply into that operational expenditure
shortfall, we find that the operating expenses category has a large and diverse
set of expenses. Here’s the list through
May 2014:
Expenditures by Line Item
OPERATING EXPENSES
OPERATING EXPENSES
Line Item
|
Expenditures Year-to-Date
|
ASSIGNED AGENCY VEHICLES
|
$151.93
|
BUILDING MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
|
$17,306.31
|
COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA RELATED SERVICES
|
$216,912.44
|
COMPUTER ACCESSORIES AND SUPPLIES
|
$12,633.35
|
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
|
$436,459.11
|
COMPUTER SERVICES
|
$49,061.49
|
CREDIT CARD EXPENDITURES
|
$125,852.17
|
DEPARTMENTAL AWARDS
|
$7,003.78
|
DOCUMENT SERVICES COPYING CHARGES
|
$119,024.82
|
DOCUMENT SERVICES MICROFILM CHARGES
|
$30,333.86
|
DOCUMENT SERVICES PHOTOTYPESETTING CHARGES
|
$0.00
|
DOCUMENT SERVICES PRINTING AND BINDING CHARGES
|
$28,974.27
|
FIRE EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
|
$125.00
|
FUEL
|
$441.02
|
LIBRARY EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES
|
$13,286.47
|
MANAGEMENT/PROFESSIONAL TRAINING
|
$0.00
|
MEALS
|
$0.00
|
MILEAGE ALLOWANCE AUTOMOBILE
|
$14,455.59
|
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES
|
$19,830.57
|
MOTOR POOL
|
$716.65
|
OFFICE EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE
|
$17,047.59
|
OFFICE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SERVICES
|
$6,919.44
|
OFFICE SUPPLIES
|
$2,741,795.18
|
OPERATIONAL TRAVEL
|
$46.63
|
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
|
$117,147.47
|
OTHER PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT&CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
|
$165,471.90
|
PC REPLACEMENT CHARGE BACK
|
$701,500.00
|
POSTAGE
|
$27,578.64
|
PRINTING ACCESSORIES AND SUPPLIES
|
$321.98
|
PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
|
$4,564.00
|
REFUSE DISPOSAL EXPENSE
|
$35,106.24
|
SECURITY, FIRE, SAFETY, AND EMERGENCY SERVICES
|
$1,177.92
|
SERVICES-OTHER AGENCY
|
$306,818.66
|
TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGE BACK (DATA CENTER
|
$119,699.00
|
TRANSLATION SERVICES
|
$366.60
|
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT
|
$275.00
|
TOTALS:
|
$5,338,405.08
|
Nowhere in the entire FCPL budget is there a concrete reference to
acquisition of library holdings. Nowhere does any table list “books and other holdings” or
words to that effect, the knowledge capital of the public library system. We suspect that the purchase of books is
hidden in the highlighted category “Office
Supplies” given the size of the expenditures--but it could be for paper clips. At the same time,
FCPL can list $321.98 in purchases of “printing accessories and supplies” on a
separate budget line. Even "Meals"--on which NO money was spent--has its own budget line. Apparently books,
magazines, online subscriptions, and the rest are not sufficiently important to
the Library’s administration to have their own budget line despite their role in the library's mission.
Of course, there is no way for the public to know how much
the Library had budgeted for “office supplies”
although the highlighted line shows that FCPL has spent about $2.7
million on “office supplies” during the fiscal year through May. By comparison, by the end of last fiscal year (FY 2013) FCPL had
spent more than $3.7 million in this nebulous purchase category—one million
dollars more spending than this year. Who knows, it too could have been spent on paper clips....
The good news possibly is that buying books is a
straightforward process--just sign a purchase order--and the funds could have been obligated and committed
in June 2014 for these acquisitions. Who
knows, there may be more books and other publicly available information
available from the library this year if it doesn’t cull too many.
We will check when the final tabulation comes in on how well
the library did in buying books and other holdings to fulfill its public
mission although this kind of accounting is not helpful.
If this is Financial Transparency I would love to see what Financial Opacity looks like. Bureaucratic Gobbledygook of the first order and first degree!
ReplyDelete