R. Rogers
15 May 2013
Notes on the Reston
Task Force Meeting, May 14, 2013
Summary: The
meeting focused on reviewing the land use planning section of the master plan
and discussing new text on the environment and parks. John Carter called for a more visionary
approach on these issues that would make Reston a model and example.
General Comments
Judy Pew read a note concerning the desirability of locating
a rec center at North Town Center.
Dick Rogers mentioned 2020 activity re schools, noting the
existence of an FCPS recommendation to DPZ on plan text, and the 2020 paper on
Soapstone. He noted that RCA will be
meeting soon on a major paper on the rec center issue, which has considerable
planning implications.
An unidentified man representing a Reston housing association
(?) praised the work of the RMPTF and DPZ in maintaining a sensible
jobs-housing balance in Reston. He said
he had treated this issue in a letter to the Washington Post.
The chair commented on Metro Silver line progress and noted
that MWAA Board meets today to finalize the phase 2 contract. She said the bid was lower than expected and
will significantly reduce financing costs.
She also mentioned that a civic group had named her “Lady Fairfax”
because of her volunteer contributions.
Land Use Review
Heidi Merkel initiated a general discussion of the DPZ plan
draft released on Monday. The initial discussion, by a meeting that was well
attended, was a review of DPZ comments and changes on the land use section
discussed at the last meeting.
She noted in particular that language had been added that
further degradation of transportation should be avoided and that certain areas
within one half mile of the station, such as south of Sunrise Valley, were out
of consideration for re-development.
The development community asked many questions on various
issues. In response to Heidi’s mention
that a section had been added on
affordable housing (saying the higher the density the greater the proportion
should be of affordable housing) Mark
Looney asked how this might relate to non-residential development and particularly
if re-development was simply “commercial replacement”. The answers was that this will be reviewed. Kohann Williams asked if DPZ was taking into
account the fact that Reston already has a high proportion of the county’s affordable
housing. Heidi agreed that Reston
already has “a generous share” of such housing.
Parcel consolidation
was discussed at length. Greg Trimmer (JBG) asked how this might relate to the
bucket idea outside the ¼ mile limit. Mark Looney said that he could foresee
cooperation by different owners but not necessarily consolidation.
Environmental Section
The issue of LEED
standards for new development triggered considerable discussion. Art Murphy led off by commenting that going
through the LEED certification process is slow and expensive and that some
developers were simply adopting the standards but avoiding the certification
process. It was also noted that the
standards were routinely changing as practices improve—what was LEED Gold is
now LEED Silver. Some noted that smaller
projects might have more difficulty than bigger projects in complying. Heidi spoke of having the DPZ “LEEDs” man
come in to talk with the RMPTF,
John Carter offered sweeping comments that he thought the RMPTF
on environmental issues should take a
more visionary approach. He thought not enough was being asked on different
environmental issues (sustainable green development, transportation and
protecting the natural environment). He
suggested the approach be “LEEDs neighborhoods” rather than just
buildings. He said the RMPTF should “put
Reston on the map” by taking a forward leaning approach and be a model
community.
In this context the JBG rep suggested an article (?) “Designing
Walkable Urban Neighborhoods.”
A more conservative view was expressed by Greg Riegle who
said “we cannot be everything in the corridor” and “we cannot legislate
sustainability.”
Mark Looney raised the issue of how some sweeping new storm
water regulations (NFI) relate to the draft text. Heidi said DPZ is still studying
this.
Parks
Heidi noted that the parks section incorporates material
from the county wide policy plan that has been pending.
Art Murphy noted that in the Tysons context there is a
conceptual park map that has been a challenge to deal with (and apparently
legally challenged). Heidi noted that a map on p. 36 that identified “opportunity
areas” (Comment: It is so vague
and generalized as to be meaningless.)
A discussion ensued about the need to be more specific on
park needs. Heidi noted that more specific ideas will be discussed in the TOD
stations sections. Larry Butler of RA spoke up on the need to look at this more
carefully. John Carter (not Bob Simon!) put in a pitch for more about plazas.
Dick Rogers raised the issue of Lake Fairfax Park, noting it
could help meet the athletic fields need.
Kohann Williams asked about
better access to the park from Reston. Heidi responded “I don’t want to be bureaucratic
but the park is not in the TOD areas.”
Next Up
Heidi noted that in response to Andy Sigle’s request at the
previous meeting to pay more attention to Wiehle station access issues, there
will be a presentation at the 28 May meeting by FC/DOT staff. DPZ will post more information on the
website. She invited comment on issues to be discussed.
On May 28 there will be additional plan text on public
facilities and transportation for discussion. Draft sections on TOD station area recommendations
will come up for the meeting, tentatively set for 11 June.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are welcome and encouraged as long as they are relevant, constructive, and decent.