A committee established by the Fairfax Board of Library Trustees met January 14th to continue deliberations on the criteria to use for the selection of a new Director for the Library Administration. Although the Trustees have sole authority and responsibility for the choice of the new Director, the committee includes representatives from several other organizations including the County, the Branch Managers, the Library Employees Association and the Library Foundation/Friends. This ensures that concerned stakeholders have a chance to express their views before the full Board of Trustees makes its final decision. The committee is led by Trustee Kerri Delaney.
The meeting began with a presentation by a County official of a proposal entitled "Public Outreach and Input into the Process - Potential Groups and Organizations." Briefly, this proposal would be to conduct a survey as to what the public would like to see in a new Director. The plan would be to "drop in" on already scheduled meetings of the County's Department of Neighborhood and Community Services (NCS) to solicit input. (The NCS oversees programming at Community, Teen and Senior Centers throughout the County.) As part of this proposal, a set of sample questions was given which could be asked of the NCS groups, who in turn would rank their views from (1) "not important" up to (5) "very important. Sample questions include:
"How important to you is it that the next Library Director be a good strong, effective, appreciative leader?"
"How important to you is it that the next Library Director motivate library staff for productivity?" and
"How important to you is it that the next Library Director be effective at working with Boards and other governing bodies?"
At this point the Chairman of the Trustees, Charles Fegan, noted he had established this committee last summer and expressed a concern that too much time was elapsing. He expressed a hope that a decision could be made by this July. In the ensuing discussion several other committee members expressed similar concerns over timing and questioned the need to further delay the development of a position description for the Director to wait for a survey that might take weeks or months. One member stated that while community input would be helpful in determining what people might want in a library, most people did not have the technical knowledge or experience to determine what skills best served the Director of a major Library system. The committee members all valued community input but most felt their work shouldn't be delayed. The survey might still be conducted, but perhaps in parallel with drafting the position description. The dissenting voices came from the County officials, one who stated it was "ridiculous" to think a Director could be chosen by July and another who made the reasonable point that it was important to build public support and suggested this could be done through public involvement.
The Chair, Kerri Delaney, reminded the committee that they did have a previously agreed upon timeline: complete the job description by the spring so that interviews could be conducted in the summer and a choice made in the fall.
Several committee members noted the committee itself had individuals with vast knowledge of library and County operations. Chairman Fegan stated he had actually put this committee together with exactly that goal in mind - to have the full range of experience needed to develop the framework for the selection process. Fegan suggested a workshop to draft a position description and Delaney proposed the committee reconvene for this purpose at the end of the following week. The committee agreed.