Reston Spring

Reston Spring
Reston Spring

Monday, January 1, 2024

More Crime and More Taxes Are Coming to Reston with a Casino

As Reston Patch has reported on several occasions in recent months, our very own Comstock Properties is pressing the State legislature to allow the construction of a gambling casino along the Silver Line that runs through Reston.  From Comstock’s perspective, it’s a moneymaker, but for Reston it offers only more criminal activity and some lower paying jobs. 

State Senator David Marsden (D) of Burke has been leading the legislative charge, including his introduction and then withdrawal of a proposal to build a casino outside the beltway near a station along the Silver Line. That leaves Tysons and Reston as targets.  He told Reston Patch he plans to introduce an expanded casino bill in the next legislative session to include a performance space and conference center at Tysons, but with a quick stroke of a pen that could become Reston. 

Heaven knows Comstock is putting a lot of money into a casino coming to its property around Reston Station at Wiehle Avenue.  So far, it has hired six lobbyists through its hospitality subsidiary and  created “Building a Remarkable Virginia” PAC that has contributed more than $500,000 to Virgina state political candidates (including $109K to Marsden and Sen. Surovell, another local casino proponent).  Virtually all the money is from Comstock executives or others closely associated with Comstock. 

What no one has done in the Virginia legislature is look at the social impacts of opening of a casino—with or without a hotel and conference center—anywhere in the state, including Reston.  And it is not an easy task.

A literature search shows that there have been over 100,000 studies of the various impacts of casino gambling on communities and beyond.  Most are economic analyses, only a few look at societal effects. Some are huge meta-analyses—studies of studies--while others are very narrow and usually esoteric.  Some are time-specific while others are longitudinal.  The main issue is that most are prepared by both professional advocates of gambling, including gambling associations, and others who virulently oppose gambling, mostly on religious grounds.  In between is a variety of academic research that is more generally balanced in its assessments. 

In looking at the criminal effects of gambling casinos on communities and surrounding areas, one study appears to stand out:  Casinos, Crime, and Community Costs, written by two distinguished professors and published in 2004.[i][1]  As the abstract states: 

We examine the relationship between casinos and crime using county-level data for the United States between 1977 and 1996. Casinos were nonexistent outside Nevada before 1978, and expanded to many other states during our sample period. Most factors that reduce crime occur before or shortly after a casino opens, whereas those that increase crime, including problem and pathological gambling, occur over time. The results suggest that the effect on crime is low shortly after a casino opens, and grows over time. Roughly 8% of crime in casino counties in 1996 was attributable to casinos, costing the average adult $75 per year.

It is comprehensive, systematic, longitudinal, and balanced.  About the only question it cannot address, is how much has changed since 1996.  There is no obvious reason why anything has changed to generate substantially different results in one direction or the other.

The clearest representation of the impact of a casino opening on crime rates is the graph below showing the change in the crime rate index from two years before to five years after the opening of a casino.  As the paper states, “Crime rates were stable prior to opening, slightly lower in the year of casino introduction, returned to approximately average levels for the next two or three years, and increased thereafter. By the fifth year after introduction, robbery, aggravated assaults, auto theft, burglary, larceny, rape, and murder were 136, 91, 78, 50, 38, 21, and 12 percent higher, respectively.

Crime Before & After Casino Opening: Casino Counties Omitting Florida in 1988, 1996

The report concludes that, “between 5.5 and 30 percent of the different crimes in casino counties can be attributed to casinos. This translates into a social crime cost associated with casinos of $75 per adult in 1996. This figure does not include other social costs related to casinos, such as crime in neighboring counties, direct regulatory costs, costs related to employment and lost productivity, social service, and welfare costs. Overall, 8.6 percent of property crime and 12.6 percent of violent crime in counties with casinos was due to the presence of the casino.”

This increase in crime rate translates into substantial increases in financial costs for Fairfax County.  Using the same method used in the source analysis and accounting for inflation ($1.00 in 1996 is $1.98 in 2023), Fairfax County’s adult population as inferred by the US Census for 2022, county costs—and our taxes—would need to increase by $130 million to cover the criminal costs generated by a casino, excluding other social costs.

Against this added cost, a 2019 consultant’s report to the state legislature’s Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission forecasts a variety of tax revenue enhancements resulting from the presence of a casino in northern Virginia.  Here are its forecasts for 2028 where available as applied to Fairfax County:

Estimated Fairfax County Tax Revenues from a Casino ($ Millions)

Fairfax Share of State Casino Revenue Tax 2028 (6%)        $18.6 MM

County Property Tax Revenues                                             $13.0 MM

Indirect/Induced County Property Tax Revenues                  $  8.7 MM

Local Sales Tax (0%)                                                                      --0—__  

Total                                                                                        $40.3 MM

 

The clear implication of these financial calculations is that Fairfax County will be some $90 million in the hole per year because of the additional crime generated by allowing a casino to be built in the county.  And this does not examine any of the non-criminal tax costs on county operations of  the presence of a casino.[2] [ii] It also does not consider the indirect of effects on county revenues from those corporations and people who decide not to develop, build, buy, rent, shop, or play here because of a casino presence.  Instead of a revenue generator for the county, a casino would be a costly added tax burden.

At the same time as the tax burden becomes heavier, so would the risk of being a victim of crime.  Using FBI data for Fairfax County on violent and property crimes reported annually through the Incident Based Reporting (IBR) system, the authors foresee increased crime from the presence of a casino.  In Fairfax County, using FCPD 2022 IBR data (the latest available), that would mean some 3,500 additional incidents of felonious violent or property crime, an 8.9% increase in the county’s crime rate.  This at a time when the county can’t fill the police officer vacancies it has despite higher pay and bonuses.  And, if the casino is in Reston, a disproportionate share of that added crime would almost certainly be here, having a major impact on Restonians’ quality of life.   

Overall, the building of a casino in Reston, Tysons, or somewhere else in Fairfax County is not likely to generate any substantial long-term benefits and, in fact, will almost certainly see costly increases in crime and other disruptive community effects as well as tax increases to control and mitigate the casino’s adverse effect.  Still, politicians, starting with State Senator David Marsden and including members of Fairfax County’s own Board of Supervisors, ignore these consequences because of a shortsighted and wrongheaded view of increased tax revenues.

We, as residents of Reston, must make sure that all these politicians understand the negative consequences of a casino on our community and county. · In the short term, please let our county state legislators know what you think about a casino before their January 4, 2004, by sending an e-mail to LegislativeTeam@fairfaxcounty.gov.

  •      In the short term, please let our county state legislators know what you think about a casino before their January 4, 2004, by sending an e-mail to LegislativeTeam@fairfaxcounty.gov. 

         You may want to include our Board of Supervisors (ClerktotheBOS@fairfaxcounty.gov) as an addee on that e-mail to make sure they understand our concerns and objections. 

Stopping the construction of a casino in Reston is critical to sustaining our quality of life in the face of corporate greed and government overreach.  Your help is critical in this effort,


1. This report was first published in 2000 as a working paper and has been enhanced several times through 2009 at least.  The data are the same in all the versions, 1977-1996.  This post relies on the 2004 version. 

2. According to the study being used here, other research indicates crime costs generally represent about 40% of the total social costs of a casino.  That would mean the total social cost of a Fairfax County casino would be on the order of $325 million per year for Fairfax residents.

 

Wednesday, December 6, 2023

"Vienna leaders: 'No dice' to N.Va. casino proposal," Vienna Gazette Leader, December 5, 2023

 This is a reposting of an article from the Vienna Gazette Leader, December 5, 2023.

Vienna leaders: 'No dice' to N.Va. casino proposal

Town Council members include opposition to gambling emporium in 2024 legislative package
 

Faced with rumblings that some state legislators again might try to authorize a gambling casino in Fairfax County, Vienna Town Council members on Dec. 4 formally signaled their opposition to that prospect.

“Any such facility likely would have substantial deleterious effects on the quality of life in Vienna, including increased traffic, additional costs to locally owned independent businesses, and erosion of public morals,” read an item on the 2024 legislative agenda approved by the Council that evening.

“This casino thing is pretty imminent, a real threat,” said Council member Nisha Patel, who successfully moved to have the casino-opposition statement placed within the 19-item legislative agenda’s Top 5 priorities.

During the General Assembly session held earlier this year, one proposed bill would have authorized a casino near any of Metrorail’s Silver Line stations in Fairfax County that were located outside Interstate 495, said Supervisor Walter Alcorn (D-Hunter Mill), who attended the Council meeting. The General Assembly has authorized a limited number of full (i.e., permanent) casinos, Alcorn said.

Council members rejected the casino prospect, especially a rumored location at Routes 123 and 7 in Tysons where a Koons auto dealership is located now.

“It would be a real body blow to Vienna,” said Council member Charles Anderson.

“It’s not wholesome,” agreed Council colleague Howard Springsteen.

Mayor Linda Colbert also opposed the casino idea and said she had been consulting with former U.S. Rep. Frank Wolf (R-10th), a longtime scourge of the gambling industry. Wolf has compiled copious information on the detriments of casinos, Colbert said.

Besides the casino item, the Council’s other four top priorities included requests for the General Assembly to:

• Authorized a state-code amendment that would allow the town to provide tree-canopy credits for development that preserves medium- and large-sized trees on lots under development or  require developers to meet 20-percent tree-canopy coverage within 10 years, versus the current 20.

• Change the Virginia Department of Transportation’s local-road-maintenance funding formula from lane mileage to lane volume or provide additional funding to localities, such as Vienna, that have average traffic volumes exceeding state averages by more than 20 percent. This has been a perennial request by the town.

• Authorize localities to hold municipal elections in May, the way things used to be before a 2021 General Assembly bill switched them all to November.

Council member Ed Somers did not run for re-election this year, but said he found this November’s election in Vienna – which featured a slew of races for the General Assembly, Board of Supervisors, constitutional offices and other items – a depressing experience.

“It was very different from May elections,” he said of the November contests, which sent Vienna voters to four precincts, versus the previous one used in May. “It diverted people from thinking about the town. There was something very special about having our elections [in May] be about our elections.”

• Not approve any bill that reduces or eliminates local land-use authority.

• Maintain qualified immunity for police officers, in recognition for split-second decisions they sometimes have to make. The town also opposes any changes to sovereign immunity.

Friday, October 27, 2023

Opinion: A Casino in Reston? Hell NO!

 Reprinted from Reston Patch

Opinion: A Casino in Reston? Hell NO!

Lynne Mulston of Citizens Opposed to Reston Casino calls on all residents of Reston to join their efforts to stop Comstock's casino plans.

Lynne Mulston of Citizens Opposed to Reston Casino calls on all residents of Reston to join their efforts to stop Comstock's casino plans.
Lynne Mulston of Citizens Opposed to Reston Casino calls on all residents of Reston to join their efforts to stop Comstock's casino plans. (Michael  O'Connell/Patch)

This opinion piece was submitted to Patch by Lynne Mulston, the campaign coordinator for Citizens Opposed to Reston Casino.

Nothing coalesces Reston like outside legislators trying to force a bad idea onto our community. For the past month the Reston community has been rallying and uniting in their opposition to the idea of . . . wait for it . . . a casino at the Wiehle-Reston East Metro Station.

A bill to establish a casino on the Silver Line was introduced in January 2023 by State Senator David Marsden (D-Burke) and Delegate Wren Williams (R-Stuart). Thankfully it was withdrawn, but only because of the forceful advocacy of Reston’s local representatives State Senators Janet Howell and Jennifer Boysko.

So why all the attention now? Well two things have happened. Through interviews with legislators and campaign finance reporting, the Patch uncovered that all roads point to the developer of the Wiehle-Reston East Metro Station, Comstock Holding Companies Inc (NASDAQ: CHCI), as the political money and lobbying force behind this legislation. And earlier this month, Senator Marsden and Delegate Williams indicated their intent to re-introduce the legislation.

The idea of a Reston casino is opposed by our local elected officials, including Hunter Mill District Supervisor Walter Alcorn, State Senator Jennifer Boysko, State Senator Janet Howell, Delegate Ken Plum, and At-Large School Board Member and candidate for Delegate Karen Keys-Gamarra.

Additionally, the Reston Association Board, which is elected by its 63,000 members, issued a statement of opposition calling upon State Senator Marsden to ‘cease all further efforts toward this end immediately.’ Reston Association added, “If you are determined to reintroduce SB 1543 or a similar bill, the Association Board of Directors demands that such legislation exclude that area within the Reston Master Plan or the area with the Reston Census Designated Place as defined by the U.S. Census from the eligible sites under consideration for a casino.”

But in interviews and public engagements, the legislation’s sponsors insist on pushing on.

They would have us believe this legislation is actually intended for Tysons. They would have us believe this is “not a casino bill, but is a referendum bill.”

It’s time we tell them a little bit about the people in Reston.

First, we know how to read a bill. And this bill does not limit the casino location to Tysons. Rather it opens it up to nearly every stop on the Silver Line in Fairfax County, including Reston. If they really intended this for Tysons, they could have written it that way.

Second, we know publicly traded companies don’t raise and spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in political contributions to pass legislation they don’t intend to use. The Patch has tracked how Comstock-related companies, its employees, and individuals it does business with have contributed directly to the bill sponsors and also funded a new political action committee to target even more.

Third, we can do math. There is a casino referendum in Richmond, and the side supporting the casino is spending more than $8 million this year alone. There are only 158,131 voters in Richmond. If a Reston casino goes to a referendum in Fairfax County, we have 784,282 voters in the county. We know the math here. This is going to be a massive and incredibly expensive campaign for our community to fight against.

Finally, we are a planned community, and an entertainment district with a casino is not in line with the community's vision for the future of Reston. Over the past three years, thirty members of our community, including representatives from developers, worked with County staff, interest groups, and the public to craft a Comprehensive Plan for the next decade of Reston's growth. In the community's plan that was approved by the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, the Wiehle Metro Station area is envisioned to be an urban neighborhood with encouragement for higher education, research and development, and tech uses. A casino would drastically change the vision for Reston.

Mr. Marsden and Mr. Williams, now that you know more about us, it’s time to be transparent.

To others, such as Fairfax Board of Supervisors Jeff McKay, who recently tried to “reassure” the county by stating “[t]here is no proposal on the table” and “[t]here is no bill that anyone has seen," — Mr. McKay, there is nothing reassuring about this. Now is the time to take a stance as bills are being drafted and negotiated for the new session. You know this.

And to our neighbors and friends, we hope you will join us. The Reston Citizens Association, Reston Strong, Rescue Reston, Reston 2020, and Save Our Sunrise have joined together to start Citizens Opposed to Reston Casino (CORC). Go to CORC's website and sign up for the email updates and sign the change.org petition.

Together, we can amplify our voices in opposition to a casino in Reston.

Sunday, August 6, 2023

Re-Engineering Fairfax Minimum Parking Requirements

 This is a re-post of Terry Maynard's op-ed in this week's Fairfax Times.

The residents of Fairfax County are about to experience a badly designed social engineering experiment carried out by the Board of Supervisors.  It’s called “Parking Reimagined.”  The essence of the concept is to change the zoning law to reduce dramatically minimum parking requirements so developers can save construction costs and increase their profits.  It does absolutely nothing for residents except make it more difficult to find a place to park at home, work, or other places they may wish to visit.

The asserted goal of “Parking Reimagined” is to get people out of their cars and on to public transit, bicycles, and their feet.  While this is noble, as presented, it does nothing to address its many consequences for county residents and others who live, work, or play here.  The county’ November 2022 white paper lists several goals made possible by the cuts in parking—more walkable communities, more affordable housing, more green space--but it does nothing to achieve them.

Yet, the real bottom line is clearly stated in this white paper:  “More productive uses of land area (i.e.—greater developer profits) once devoted to parking adds value to the County’s tax base.”  The county doesn’t really care about the other “goals.”  They’re just part of the sales pitch.  They want more tax revenue and developers want more profits!

But, of course, that’s not all:  Parking Reimagined calls for all parking “adjustments” (i.e.—reductions below the minimum base minimum parking requirement) to be decided by the Director of Land Development Services up to a 60% threshold in a process requiring NO public input.  The math says that means the parking requirement for future housing and other development could be about one-third of what it is today in the base case without so much as a public meeting, much less a hearing and Board of Supervisors approval.  What could go wrong?

And there is more.  Developers don’t need to add any parking if they decide to expand their existing development by up to ten percent.  Expansions between 10%-30% would require additional parking at the reduced parking standard (minus any “adjustments”) and, in many if not most cases, would be approved administratively—no public input. 

And all these kinds of residential minimum parking requirement reductions apply in varying degrees to every single type of development and renovation across the county from office buildings to retail. 

All this may make more sense by looking at a real example:  the redevelopment of Crescent Apartments in Reston.  These affordable (ADU) apartments owned by the county are part of Lake Anne Village Center.  The county is now studying how it should be redeveloped, starting with Crescent Apartments.  Here are the calculations for the implications of Parking Reimagined for Crescent Apartments:

  • Current:  181 apartments with at least 235 parking spaces (1.3 spaces/dwelling unit); housing for 380 people using county housing calculations (2.1 people/unit). That’s two-thirds of a parking spot for each resident.
  • Proposed:  935 apartments under the consolidated option with 972 parking spaces required (1.04 spaces/dwelling unit—a 20% reduction from the current minimum); housing for 1,964 people. That’s about one spot for every two people expected to live there.
  • “Adjusted”:  The Director of Land Development Services, at the request of the developer and without any hearings, reduces the number of parking spaces at Crescent Apartment by another 60% to 389 spaces or roughly one space for every five people expected to live there.

So, while the number of planned apartments quintuples, the number of parking spaces could less than double.  That is a future shortfall of 280 to 826 parking spaces at a redeveloped Crescent Apartments based on today’s minimum parking requirement. 

And for Crescent residents, the alternative transportation options are not good.  Crescent Apartments is 2.0 miles from the nearest Metro stop—Reston Station.  Bus service to Reston, Herndon, and Tysons Metro stations runs at about half-hour intervals during peak periods, making it  difficult for commuters.   People are not going to walk to Reston Station (38 minutes) although some may bike (12 minutes).  Taxis/Uber are expensive alternatives for regular use, especially for those in affordable housing.  As a result, Crescent Apartment residents largely rely on their automobiles to reach jobs, shopping, entertainment, etc.  To add public transit and other needed infrastructure would almost certainly require another Transportation Service District tax for Lake Anne Village Center as now exists in Reston’s transit station areas ($0.021 per $100 valuation).

If Parking Reimagined is approved and Crescent Apartments re-developed, what will happen is that more residents will park along already crowded North Shore Drive and, if they can get away with it, at Lake Anne’s Washington Plaza or even more distant schools and churches—not a fun walk in rain, sleet, snow, and oppressive heat.  As a result, their quality of life will be reduced unnecessarily so developers and the county may make more money.

In short, Parking Reimagined is a one-dimensional social engineering experiment to force people out of their cars that ignores the wide variety of consequences it would generate and fails to guarantee the societal gains it states as goals.  Most importantly it fails to consider the complexities faced by people living, working, and playing in our county and the Reston community.  If approved, the county will create a less desirable place to live and likely lead to the growing outmigration of residents.

If you share these concerns, please let Supervisor, Walter Alcorn know.  You may also wish to share your concerns with the entire Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission, whose next hearing on the topic is scheduled for 7:30 PM, Wednesday, September 13, 2023, at the Fairfax County Government Center.  Be there—and testify if you want—or tune in on Channel 16.

Terry Maynard

Reston 20/20 Committee

Reston, VA